Switching to Renewable Natural Gas Reduces GHG Emissions...Beyond Sust — DiamondSci Skip to content
Switching to Renewable Natural Gas Reduces GHG Emissions...Beyond Sustainability

Switching to Renewable Natural Gas Reduces GHG Emissions...Beyond Sustainability

Renewable Natural Gas reduces GHG emissions

Switching from conventional natural gas (fossil fuel) to renewable natural gas results in a reduction in greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions that benefit climate change. One method used to determine the climate benefit offered by a fuel is to assess its carbon footprint, often referred to as carbon intensity, over its complete lifecycle, taking the GHG emissions produced during the production, transportation and consumption of the fuel into account.

According to estimates produced by the Alternative Fuel Life-Cycle Environmental and Economic Transportation (AFLEET) tool developed by the Argonne National Laboratory, RNG powered natural gas vehicles can reduce GHG emissions by as much as 75% compared to vehicles running on petroleum based fossil fuels. The California Air Resources Board conducts a similar lifecycle analysis to evaluate GHG emissions of vehicle fuels when implementing the Low Carbon Fuel Standard.

Natural gas, regardless of whether it is derived from fossil gas or renewable natural gas, has a lower carbon footprint compared to conventional fossil fuels that they are replacing, including coal and petroleum based fuels such as diesel and gasoline used to power vehicles and produce electricity. Compared to fossil natural gas, renewable natural gas fares even better in terms of it overall carbon footprint when taking GHG emissions produced during its production, transportation and use into consideration. Some renewable natural gas projects can have an even lower carbon footprint if methane emissions that would have been produced by the organic waste that was converted into natural gas is taken into account.

In cases where methane emissions are substantially reduced by diverting organic waste from its normal method of disposal (for example food waste, wastewater sludge or manure that would otherwise be sent to a landfill) for use as RNG feedstock that is fed into an anaerobic digester, can result in a negative carbon footprint. While RNG projects that collect methane produced as a result of day-to-day operations, such as landfills or wastewater treatment facilities, cannot claim any climate benefit from capturing and destroying methane, as they are required to do so, they can account for climate benefits from GHG emission reductions achieved by recovering the energy (from the methane source) that would previously have been wasted when the methane was flared (since they are not required to recover energy). However, these projects will still have a positive rather than a negative carbon footprint overall.

Other Benefits of RNG Vehicles

Besides the reduction in GHG emissions, vehicles powered by renewable natural gas improve local air quality and are quieter than their diesel powered counterparts, which has positive health benefits for local communities.


An Overview of Renewable Natural Gas from Biogas. July 2020, EPA 456-R-20-001.

Featured Image by  Sam P 98 / CC BY-SA
Previous article Appeals Court Scraps Trump-era Landfill Methane Emissions Rule

Send Inquiry For More Info